Judge Linda Morgan in Van Nuys, CA has the perfect recipe how to punish the work-injured breadwinners. Openly aiding the insurance companies as she ignores a request for a hearing under due process by work injured chef, whose prescriptions and treatments have been cancelled and withheld for months by Broadspire insurance.
The duty for judicial appointee Mrs. Morgan was to uphold the law. She decided not to, despite her knowledge that the insurer removed prescriptions illegally, which was objected by three doctors. The work injured chef made desperate attempt to stay alive. He begged for a court hearing, but this cruela judge whose six figure salary allows to spike herself with eight inch Manolos (very expensive shoes) didn’t responded. The chef sued her in the Superior Court – docket #05E06544.
The government provides an attorney for the judges or government employees in general, paid by the taxpayers. You might not know that even if the judicial decision in civil court leads to a fatal harm of breadwinners moms, dads or anyone work injured. The judge has immunity to error per CCP 430.10 subd (a)(e) Stump vs. Sparkman, 435 US 349, 355-356 (1978). He/she is of the hook, ready to drink another bottle of expensive Crystal champagne.
Superior Court Judge Gregg Marcus dismissed this case under judicial immunity. This was objected by the chef as judge Morgan actually failed to engage in the activity of her duty in the first place: To issue any order or a judicial notice. Simply – Judge Morgan’s non-activity doesn’t make her immune to the errors.
The chef wrote to Judge Marcus, whether he would personally meet with a fourth grader, whose father committed suicide\, and reconsider his demission. On the birthday of this 12 years old boy, tears of sorrow are longing for his father: mentor and protector. The father is not in his son’s life anymore. He’d committed suicide as the insurer denied his treatments and the American Judicial System failed to protect him. Would you like to meet this twelve year old? I’m calling on you Judge Marcus, as a member of the public: rise with the fallen and give the opportunity to the voice of justice. Let me argue this case in the court! There are legal threads in my complaint connected to the authority of Superior Court setting. All court cases end with an infinity as no case supersedes “In the interest of Justice”.
Judge Gregg Marcus never responded. He went home to his family, to hug his son. He believes that nothing can happen to injured and disabled public, affected by his decision. He must know the tears of four grader will never dry. The voice of justice is unanswered.
The survey group stated: “This is an outright abetting and encouraging Broadspire Insurance not to provide services, they are obligated to”. We, the taxpayers pay for this. Judge Morgan actually acts as an employee of the insurance, not the public service.
Comment as a member of public tribunal on Judicial action of Judge Morgan by posting your opinions on this blog.
a) is her job as a judge satisfactory on the behalf of the injured public or
b) is she siding with the insurance companies?
November 10, 2007 at 12:35 am |
I am an attorney for injured workers and I have always found Judge Morgan to be more than fair. The problem is our Governator, the Judges cannot make the law, only work with the hand they’re dealt. I’m sorry for your bad experience but I can tell you I’ve been appearing in her court for years and she’s always done right by the injured workers I represent.
November 11, 2007 at 12:10 am |
To the anonymous:
I’ve had the opportunity to review the case of the chef and I do disagree with you as a due process of the chef has been judicially biased.
One more thing: Anonymous is a bounce of insecurity
November 11, 2007 at 3:23 am |
Sorry about yo experience. I’m also a chef and found Judge Morgan to be a lovely woman. Maybe you shoulda asked her to make sweet lovin.
November 11, 2007 at 11:19 pm |
To Chef:
It seem to be that you smell the ovens in Judge Morgan’s “million dollar house” (?) Moreover, you are cooking her recipe as her private chef. Did you hear the story about a “royal taster” buried in Kensington cemetery in 1625?
November 12, 2007 at 2:21 am |
My favorite recipe if for my “famous” salty chocalate balls.
http://i71.photobucket.com/albums/i132/VINCESPUKE/chef_scientologist1.jpg
November 12, 2007 at 9:32 pm |
can you ask the judge where she got her manolos??? i’ve found the 4″ heels but none anywhere near 8″. i’m looking for 6″ platforms at most but would like to see the 8″ manolos just for curiousity’s sake
To sleepless in Seattle:
If your response is a sympathetic reaction to Judge Linda Morgan, here is my comment:
Probably you don’t have a access to any row of seats in “Manolos Milan Shows”. Regardless I would suggest that you would not try 8 inch heels as you might get injured and end up on Workers’ Compensation in Judge Linda Morgan’s courtroom, as she would indulge you in Catacombs of Pain.
November 13, 2007 at 11:53 pm |
I think I saw a soap opera like this once.
And we all know Presiding Judges for the State of California ALL have castles! And Butlers! And hang out with P.Diddy in the Hamptons! Damn those rich people!
I would like to see ANYONE balance in a pair of 8 inch Manolo Blahniks, though.
To Miss Dulcinea:
It seems to be that your are a fan of the FABS – Sex in the City crowd. I would suggest that you get friendly with stylists of Kylie Minogue or Victoria Beckham, you will find that custom work for the mortals and immortals celebrities are done by fashion/shoes designers.
November 18, 2007 at 10:37 pm |
Any chef must be concern when his employee’s medical treatments are denied by the employer’s workers’ compensation insurance. Judge Morgan is denying his right to hearing on this matter to receive medical treatments. I thought the court system should protect the public. Now I see, this is not the case.
November 26, 2007 at 12:36 am |
Have you tried to remedy the situation through every possible legal channel? If you hire a good attorney he might possibly have Judge Morgan’s ruling overturned. Or maybe it was a proper decision and you have a case of “sour grapes”.
To “Anonymous” wanna be (not yet famous) attorney who hides his legal knowledge in “Pandora Box”
If you are not a bragger extraordinaire, your comment seems to be one from the attorney blessed with bravery. I suggest that you contact the Chef and represent him in Judge Morgan’s case. This may get you media accolades and likely flourish to your legal practice.
April 24, 2009 at 11:29 am |
I follow your posts for a long time and must tell that your posts always prove to be of a high value and quality for readers.